hails
Both the reading and listening discuss whether cloud seeding will be beneficial for the US farmer to get rid of hail that damage a lot of crops. The former argues that cloud seeding may have a great impact on reducing the amount of hail but the latter contradicts each of the points made by the reading.
First of all, the reading contends that some laboratory experiments confirm that the silver iodide helps the cloud to reduce the hail in the precipitation and allow the cloud to precipitate only the snow and the rain. In contrast, the lecturer argues that although it reduces hail formation it also blocks all kinds of precipitation. Moreover, it can create further problems by creating the drought problem to the farmer by reducing the amount of rain and snow that will damage more due to the lack of water.
Secondly, some Asian countries successfully imply cloud seeding to control precipitation in cities and hope that this will also be applicable to US farmers. However, the professor rebuts that, these experiments are done in the urban and cities where the environmental pollutions are high and the pollutant particle help the cloud formation nuclei that help the rain system. Also added that this will not apply to the US farmer because the farmlands do not have the pollutant particle to have cloud formation nuclei.
Finally, the text claims that some local studies found that cloud seeding areas are less hail-damaged areas compared to the other areas and predicts that it will apply to all areas damaged by hail. On the other hand, the listening counters that, the hail are not only damaging the local areas but also the nearby areas are also damaged highly by the hail. He further argues that the result is not artificially controllable since it is a natural reason since the pattern damage several similar natural areas damaged by the hails.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-31 | S M Naimul Mamun | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | S M Naimul Mamun | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | ali1121 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | ali1121 | 76 | view |
- frog 80
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifolia, a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida, started to die out. No one is sure exactly what caused the decline, but chances are good that if nothing is done, Torreya will soon become extinct. Experts 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In order to succeed in study or job the ability to adjust or adapt to changing conduction or circumstance is more important than having knowledge 3
- Ethanol fuel, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States. However, many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons.First, th 71
- Astro 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ach of the points made by the reading. First of all, the reading contends that ...
^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ation nuclei that help the rain system. Also added that this will not apply to the U...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89905362776 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50418749895 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473186119874 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.0 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.2668571977 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.181818182 110.228320801 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 21.698381199 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06452816374 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241094102361 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111030212471 0.0996497079465 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10798830291 0.0662205650399 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157218065181 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944200473793 0.0443174109184 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.8541721854 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.