Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone.
Do you agree or disagree?
People nowadays argue that activities done in a group teach more important skills than those who do their activities alone. Whereas, I believe that those who work together in a group can learn more new things than those who do it alone.
Firstly, Any work which has involved a group of people can be done more accurately and rapidly. The ideas generated from each of the candidates are different which gives options to the group for the best idea; Furthermore, each and everyone can take help from one another for the best result. For example, A good and fast car can only be made by a group of people with different expertise, which in the end is a result of everyone's knowledge and sharing of ideas.
Secondly, There is no doubt that working alone can also give you optimum results, but, it will take more and more time as there is no one to correct if something goes wrong. At the same time, doing something alone is a more time-consuming process that cannot stand in this fast-paced world where time is money. Whereas, working alone can separate you from others as these habits build an attitude that helps people for their personal development as an individual.
In the end, I would like to mention that, There are different people with various opinions on working. some like to work alone and some like to do it in a group, but according to me those who work in a group has the upper hand on his or her confidence and that one thing is the game-changer in any skill you are trying to learn.
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 67
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000 2005 and 2010 about one university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The movement of people from the countryside into the cities is happening in many parts of the world resulting in the problems especially in cities What are the causes of this movement and how can it be reversed Give reasons for your answer and include any 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...an those who do their activities alone. Whereas, I believe that those who work together...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...eople with various opinions on working. some like to work alone and some like to do ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53676470588 5.12529762239 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42079326914 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533088235294 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 399.6 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4306814189 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371465744209 0.244688304435 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147958585729 0.084324248473 175% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119557131261 0.0667982634062 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213764210905 0.151304729494 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113027567344 0.056905535591 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 12.4159519038 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.