Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own local environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Protection of the environment is an indispensable task for everyone. Whilst some people think that authorities should constrain individuals to take care of the nature of their own community, in this essay, I present arguments in support of the notion that people should take responsibility towards the whole environment.
On the one hand, maintaining local eco-balance is grave for indigenous people. In many locations, the wealth of inhabitants directly depends on ecological components. Such as soil and water. Thus, to preserve them in good condition and to avoid any kind of contamination is essential not only for health status but also for living conditions. Quality of soil, for instance, can easily deteriorate as a result of extensive usage of chemicals, and
Consequently, it becomes less prolific after a short period of time.
Therefore, everybody engaged in agriculture should shun any activity that may have a harmful effect on the local nature.
On the other hand, the protective initiatives of nature should not be confined locally only. Many activities of humans can negatively affect the general environment. For example, driving a car or reckless usage of electricity may contribute to increases in carbon emissions, which certainly imposes threats not only on local nature but also creates perils for the world's ecosystem. Therefore, individuals should think of their community environments as an uninterruptable part of the global system.
In conclusion, although governments compel their citizens to bear responsibility for the local natural environment, it is paramount that they have also monitor their activities in concern to the negative impact on the global status of the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-07 | Huyenlbg87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | Huyenlbg87 | 78 | view |
- An American film actor John Wayne once said Tomorrow is important and precious How is it important for individuals and societies to think about the future than focusing on the present only 73
- IN the future it seems more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars TO what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The maps below shows the museum s plant in 1998 and after some changes were made in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years The evolution of the horse with particular emphasis on the changing foot structure 78
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ult of extensive usage of chemicals, and Consequently, it becomes less prolific a...
^^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... it becomes less prolific after a short period of time. Therefore, everybody engaged in agri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 365, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... nature but also creates perils for the worlds ecosystem. Therefore, individuals shoul...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 153, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'monitored'.
Suggestion: monitored
...nt, it is paramount that they have also monitor their activities in concern to the nega...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5303030303 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17647458943 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.0237491412 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1538461538 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250527588387 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739493352627 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052163091914 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115314734736 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557025876685 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.