The table shows the international tourist arrivals in the top eight countries in 2009 and 2010 and the changes in percentage.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the number of overseas tourists from 9 countries who reached different destinations around the world during the period from 2009 to 2010.
It can be clearly seen that while the number of visitors to most of the countries mentioned experienced a significant increase, Hong Kong, on the other hand, recorded a sharp decline. Moreover, although France had a period of stability, it remained the most popular country with holidaymakers.
It is obvious that despite a very low number of tourists (11 million), Germany had the fastest growth in the figure for visitors, increasing by 109% to reach a high of 23 million in 2010. China ranked second with 34 million foreign tourists in 2010, which rose by 55% compared to 33% of international travelers arriving in Turkey. Other countries including the US, Spain, UK, and Italy saw a slightly slower change, ranging from 1.5% to 3.6%.
By contrast, Hong Kong witnessed a negative trend in the number of foreign tourists when its figure dropped by -11%, falling from 10 million to 9 million a year later. France, however, had a similar number of tourists (76 million) compared to the previous year and remained the best holiday attraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-12-25 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
- Task 2 Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets should have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods while others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging Discuss both these views and give you 89
- The chart andgraph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began 11
- The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 48
- The diagram shows how to build a teepee Summarise the information by reporting and selecting main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 11
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, second, while, as to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.025 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72282481993 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.8407861778 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.625 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119360516864 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544143649925 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0416430909598 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.078021035151 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446319011915 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.