The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station.
people have different views about the funding of creative artists. While
some people disagree with the idea of government support for artists, I
believe that money for art projects should come from both governments
and other sources.
some art projects definitely require help from the state. In the UK, there
are many works of art in public spaces, such as streets or squares in city
centres. In Liverpool, for example, there are several new statues and
sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeveloped
recently. these artworks represent culture, heritage and history. they
serve to educate peoples about the city, and act as landmarks or talking
points for visitors and tourists. governments and local council should
pay creative artists to produce this kind of art, because without their
funding our cities would be much less interested and attractive.
On the other hand, I can understands the arguments against government
funding for art. The main reason for this view are that governments have
more important concerns. For example, state budgets need to be spent
on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas.
these public services are vital for a country to function properly, whereas
the work of creative artists, even in public places, is a luxury. Another
reason for this opinion is that artists do a job like any other professional,
and they should therefore earn their own money by selling their work.
In conclusion, there are good reasons why artists should rely on
alternative sources of financial support, but in my opinion government
help is sometimes necessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-31 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-21 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | phadode | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | ngô huyền ngọc | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
people have different views about the funding ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...m both governments and other sources. some art projects definitely require help fr...
^^^^
Line 8, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'docks'' or 'dock's'?
Suggestion: docks'; dock's
...eral new statues and sculptures in the docks area of the city, which has been redeve...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 11, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
..., which has been redeveloped recently. these artworks represent culture, heritage an...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...epresent culture, heritage and history. they serve to educate peoples about the cit...
^^^^
Line 11, column 35, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...king points for visitors and tourists. governments and local council should pay creative ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 14, column 26, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'understand'
Suggestion: understand
...d attractive. On the other hand, I can understands the arguments against government fundi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 18, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...cture and security, among other areas. these public services are vital for a country...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38167938931 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65703688295 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 106.607317073 153% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62213740458 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1853079609 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.714285714 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 3.83414634146 600% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 40.7170731707 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.