TOO MANY OLD HISTORIC BUILDINGS ARE IN DANGER AND DESTROYED IN MANY COUNTRIES WHAT ARE THE MAIN REASON HOW TO PROTECT THEM

Essay topics:

TOO MANY OLD HISTORIC BUILDINGS ARE IN DANGER AND DESTROYED IN MANY COUNTRIES. WHAT ARE THE MAIN REASON? HOW TO PROTECT THEM?

This is a fact that ancient buildings are the heritage of a country. It is provided that in some parts of world traditional buildings has been diminishing by people which is a huge risk for them. There are number of potential causes of this phenomenon, several measures can be applied to preserve historical architectures.

On the one hand, due to some primary reasons, the early buildings are destroyed by people. Firstly, in the modern age, technical advancements are taking place day by day for providing convenience to people. In this competitive era, majority of the people prefer to construct their houses using contemporary and stylish designs, so it is replacing outdated designing with innovative styles of structures. As a consequent, buildings that date back hundreds of years are knocked down for the purpose of establishing new ones. Secondly, with the growth of population, need for space arises as for providing accommodation higher authorities have to manage the space accordingly. So, in order to fulfill the basic needs of shelter and to bring prosperity in the nation people are destroying earlier constructions. Finally, the creation of new technology the planners require land for building modern building, therefore, traditionally built designs are at rest of being destroyed.

On the other hand, implementation of a few methods can assist in protecting these buildings. First of all, spending some money on maintaining old architectures can help preserving ancient buildings from its destruction. Moreover, imposing ban on knowing down traditionally designed structures results in long time survival of historical establishments. In addition to this, instead of removing these buildings, it should make more appealing for attracting tourists as ancient art works impress people from all around the globe. Hence, protection of these structures would leads to foreign reserves that will uplift the economic position of the country.

To conclude, Although there are many advancements in technology now that pose a threat to old buildings, i firmly believe that by applying some measures the issues can be sorted out.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-01-17 lakhveer khokhar 89 view
2019-07-30 prabhleenpreet kaur 52 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and stylish designs, so it is replacing outdated designing with innovative style...
^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o fulfill the basic needs of shelter and to bring prosperity in the nation people...
^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to preserve' or 'preserve'.
Suggestion: to preserve; preserve
... maintaining old architectures can help preserving ancient buildings from its destruction....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g down traditionally designed structures results in long time survival of histori...
^^
Line 5, column 386, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...shments. In addition to this, instead of removing these buildings, it should mak...
^^
Line 5, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n addition to this, instead of removing these buildings, it should make more app...
^^
Line 5, column 576, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...e, protection of these structures would leads to foreign reserves that will uplift th...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, in addition, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1813.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11176034132 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615615615616 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7781711132 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.3125 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8125 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121588025257 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380265696852 0.084324248473 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284033908959 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0748625976419 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160253405953 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.84 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.