Due to technology mobile phones are disrupting social interactions. To what extent you are agree or disagree?
Technical advancements are taking place day by day in every field of life. Many argue that invention of smart phones hinders the face to face communication among people. While i believe that introduction of portable devices has eliminated the need to meet physically, i also support that it facilitates instant communication that is really demanding in these days.
On the one hand, Mobiles has widen the communication gap among individuals because of several reasons. First of all, cell phones have brought people closer to each other as internet is accessible by everyone in today’s fast - paced world and they find it convenient to send a message or make a call instead of visiting the respective person. Therefore, interacting socially is becoming unusual nowadays and automation is bringing people away from each other. Secondly, everyone has hectic schedule of life because both genders are working, so no one has time to spend time with others by meeting at public places. As a consequent, physical contact is replaced by online communication owing to progress in technology. Finally, phones are used in an effort to save precious time and expenses as if people commute from one place to another they have to bear travelling expenses and have to spend time on journey. That is why, To avoid this people tend to make conversations via calls or messages that results in increasing physical gap between them. Also, spending huge amount of time on browsing internet restricts people, especially, young ones to go out and socialize with others in the society.
On the other hand, I also opine that it brings people close to each other by providing various fast communication means. First of all, In modern age, masses keep themselves active on social media such as Facebook, Instagram and Twitter which enhances communication as they are able to contact immediately in case of an emergency. Hence, Social interactions are not usual because they have another convenient method to be in touch with each other. In addition to this, Entire world has become a global village because of online communication as people can be updated with other nations as well.
To conclude. Although smart devices has influenced social interactions greatly and people allocate more time to using cell phones, i also believe that by providing 24 hours instant communication it has strengthen the relationships of people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-12 | lakhveer khokhar | 11 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | ndbro17 | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-13 | ndbro17 | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-08 | SNEHA GANGWANI | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-08 | SNEHA GANGWANI | 78 | view |
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- You are leaving a job and coming back to your hometown Write a letter to your friend and say What is the reason for your leaving What do you plan to do Where and when will you meet your friend to discuss it 71
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines Should parents be made by law to immunize their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunize their children 78
- Your best friend just had her first baby You are currently overseas but will be returning to your hometown in a week Write to your friend In your letter congratulate your friend tell her when you will be returning home ask when you could drop in to meet h 61
- Popular events like the Football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tension and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... face communication among people. While i believe that introduction of portable d...
^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'widened'.
Suggestion: widened
... days. On the one hand, Mobiles has widen the communication gap among individuals...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 933, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... time on journey. That is why, To avoid this people tend to make conversations via c...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1062, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hysical gap between them. Also, spending huge amount of time on browsing internet...
^^
Line 3, column 1114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t of time on browsing internet restricts people, especially, young ones to go out...
^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ency. Hence, Social interactions are not usual because they have another convenie...
^^
Line 5, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e communication as people can be updated with other nations as well. To concl...
^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'strengthened'.
Suggestion: strengthened
...g 24 hours instant communication it has strengthen the relationships of people.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, if, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, in addition, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2019.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 391.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16368286445 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85685926982 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552429667519 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1869392498 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.1875 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4375 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0760636395296 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0261038460965 0.084324248473 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292445263449 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0482763517249 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163157816709 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.