The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant
The table compares the percentages of age, income and poverty population in 3 states in the United States, namely, California, Utah and Florida in 2000.
Overall, Utah had the highest population under 18 but the lowest 65-and-older population. It is clear that people in California was the biggest earners but suffered more from poverty than other states.
People aged under 18 made up 32,20% of Utah population while the figures for California and Florida were smaller, accounting for 27% and 23%, respectively. Regarding the 65-over age group, the largest plurality was in Florida at 17,60% while California took second place with only 10,60%. Utah’s elder population represented the lowest share of 8,50%.
Regarding average income per capita, California is the leading state with $23,000, followed by Florida and Utah, at $22,000 and $17,000, respectively. Much as people in California were paid annually higher than other state, more people lived in poverty, representing 14,20%. The second poorest state among the 3 states was Florida at 12,50%. Only 9,40% of Utah residents was under the poverty line.
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 70
- Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individual and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Everyone should stay at school until 18 To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- Online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. Is it a positive or negative development? 89
- Some people believe that if a police force carries guns, this encourages higher level of violence int hat society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37714285714 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66034215998 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588571428571 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0577314872 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121084977706 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563798399395 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0437084132141 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0913798890868 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527141037748 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.