The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985, 1995, and 2005
Some money spent by US’s teenager or adults to buy clothes per in 1985, 1995, and 2005 is presented in the chart.
Overall, women spent most of budgets on clothes over the periods with the rising trend. While the figure for men’s clothes showed a fluctuation, the figure for teenager’s ones tend to stable.
In 1985, money spent on boy and girl’s clothes had same at far below $200. While figure for boy’s ones remained stable, being the lowest budgets over the periods, girls spent more slight budgets with around a quarter of women’s clothes, the highest budgets in 2005 compared with other budgets.
When it come in men’s clothes figure, after reaching a peak at just over 400 in 1995, some money spent showed decline to 400 in 2005. However, women used their money much more than others and the figures experienced growing trend, from over 400 in 1995 to slight over 600 in the last period.
- the two maps below show and island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 73
- Some people believe arts are important in people s lives Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe arts are important in people s lives Do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
- Some people believe that tax on junk food should be risen What is the purpose of this notion What is the negative impact of this notion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 22, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the budgets') or simply say ''most budgets''.
Suggestion: most of the budgets; most budgets
...d in the chart. Overall, women spent most of budgets on clothes over the periods with the ri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comes'?
Suggestion: comes
...compared with other budgets. When it come in men’s clothes figure, after reaching...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 760.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81012658228 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15792157892 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 206.1 283.868780488 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1872851131 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.571428571 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204783557708 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113987323038 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107017261023 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155937887956 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11420819714 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.