The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished, the charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The numbers of people who visit Ashdown Museum and the results of satisfaction surveys before and after refurbished periods are revealed in the table and charts below.
Generally, there were significant increased on number of visitors after refurbishment. In addition, surveys of visitor satisfaction showed an improvement in the same period.
During the year before reconstruction, the number of visitors to the museums stood at 74.000. While the biggest proportion of those people felt dissatisfied with the museum’s services at 40%, such service made satisfied and very satisfied for 30% and 15% of total visitors respectively. However, only one a tenth had very dissatisfied feelings.
After refurbishment, the number of visitors revealed a rise by 18.000 followed by increasing satisfaction with 35% and 40% who felt very satisfied and satisfied respectively. In addition, the figure for those who felt dissatisfied declined by 25%, and a half for very dissatisfied compared with the previous period. However, only 5% did not participate in this survey.
- The chart below shows annual average spending on clothes per person in the US in 1985 1995 and 2005 73
- the table shows consumer durable owned in Britain from 1972 to 1983
- Some people believe arts are important in people s lives Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people believe arts are important in people s lives Do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the amount of waste production in millions of tonnes in six different countries in three different years over a twenty year period
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 907.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56441717791 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19195326118 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.0313481976 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.777777778 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357274565354 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149773444279 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11355019039 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237447727882 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873993466855 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.