Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that there is a growing concern that most wild animals are on the edge of extinction. While I tend toward the viewpoint that we should take wildlife conservation into account more seriously, I would have to support a limited number of species protected.
On the one hand, some people think that all wild animals should be protected. The main reason behind this view is that all of them play an important role in the ecosystem. Should there be one of these animals extinct, then the ecosystem might be unbalanced, and it may result in a catastrophic effect on the environment. Moreover, it is believed that all animals are important and should be equally treated. To clarify, protect some selected animals may lead to some others’ extinction.
On the other hand, there are a plethora of compelling reasons why we should focus on protecting only a certain number of wild animals. Firstly, overpopulation of wild animals could be a threat to our existence. In other words, some animals are danger to human life and resources. Kangaroo, case in point, its overpopulation caused so many troubles beyond control that kangaroo meat is encouraged for human consumption. The second reason is that conserving animals requires a large amount of money while these funds can be allocated for humanity issues instead, as many countries are struggling against Covid-19 pandemic or starvation.
In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be reasonable to support wildlife conservation because of its effect on the ecosystem. Having said that, I personally agreed with the idea of protecting a limited number of wild species.
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- People nowadays tend to take their family to another country when they work abroad Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages 84
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 95
- It is unaccepted that people who work in certain professions e g finance media entertainment and sport are paid such high salaries while others who do more important jobs in society are underpaid To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, so, then, while, in conclusion, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05204460967 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87526702882 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8191631667 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431505658411 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154467657643 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107476003097 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23251583239 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.139019544699 0.056905535591 244% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.