Some people think that international car-free days are an effective way to reducing air pollution, others think there are other ways. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, car-free days have been known as one of the most impressive measure to limit the low-quality air statue. Although this method has been receiving great puplic support , various other ways should be considered too.
Several reasons could explain why international car-free days is favoured by a great number of citizens. First, it is obvious that car exhaust is the chief cause contributing to air pollution. Therefore by banning cars for some particular days, residents would have the tendency of using other means of transportation such as bicycles, trains,.. which reduces the high proportion of pollutants like CO2 significantly. Another effect of international car-free days is heightening citizens’ awareness of the benefits of eco-friendly vehicles. This means that finding different means of transportations which substitutes for cars is able to make residents realize that car is not as essential as they expected.
However, in order to decrease the low quality air status nowadays, both government and individuals should apply a wide range of viable measures. Firstly, many people would forget that improper waste managerment process such as burning landfill could be a more dramatic way deteriorating air quality. So adopting strict laws to enforce safer waste disposal is essential. Another measure could be taken to encourage citizens to take more actions to increase the amount of carbon dioxin taken out of the air. For example, planting more trees, bamboo, other plants are able to raise the number of carbon sinks in the world.
In conclusion, although it is clear the international car-free days are extreme success method, governments should adopt more feasible solutions to address this problem.
- Some people think that international car free days are an effective way to reducing air pollution others think there are other ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people think that international car free days are an effective way to reduce air pollution others think there are other ways Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... has been receiving great puplic support , various other ways should be considered...
^^
Line 2, column 194, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ef cause contributing to air pollution. Therefore by banning cars for some particular day...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 343, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... transportation such as bicycles, trains,.. which reduces the high proportion of p...
^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...transportation such as bicycles, trains,.. which reduces the high proportion of po...
^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Which
...nsportation such as bicycles, trains,.. which reduces the high proportion of pollutan...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nsportation such as bicycles, trains,.. which reduces the high proportion of pollutan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45724907063 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93206107838 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635687732342 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6085754316 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.857142857 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2142857143 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247419767017 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759349093462 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391863976369 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135582262957 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436811640285 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.