The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car, bus or train between 1970 and 2030
The line graph compares three types of vehicles in terms of use by Uk residents between the years 1970 and 2030.
The line graph illustrates the average number of UK residents using several vehicles between the years 1970 and 2030.
In general, it is obvious that the average number of commuters driving car and train increased quickly in Uk while the bus saw a declining trend in the given duration.
To begin with, in 1970, the average population of British who used the car at around 5 million and the bus and train were used by about 4 and 2 million people respectively. Over the next 5 years, there were the growing tendency of people using train and car at around 3 and 7 million but the data of bus decreased gradually about 3.5 million
By 2030, the average number of British driving car reached the highest at around 9 million while the data of people who used bus reached the lowest at around 3 million
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-10 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | chau hoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | view | |
| 2023-07-26 | xuongrongnho | 10 | view |
- Wild animals have no place in the 21st century so protecting them is a waste of resources To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 56
- The graph below shows the average number of UK commuters travelling each day by car bus or train between 1970 and 2030 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 299, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t around 3 and 7 million but the data of bus decreased gradually about 3.5 millio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52409638554 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35085682208 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475903614458 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1982968193 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.2 22.9334400587 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321231624134 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210896897121 0.103423049105 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665635745941 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207944329623 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695490226906 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.53 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.75 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.