The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons

Essay topics:

The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides information on the percentage of households which use electrical appliances while the other chart contains data about number of hours of housework every week from 1920 to 2019. Overall, the lowest percentage of using all the electrical appliances was in 1920 while the highest percentage also in 2019, on the other hand, people who work in the 1920 has more hours of work and it declined each year since 1940, and reached its lowest point in the 2019.

In terms of the appliances, about 40 percent people use the washing machine, which is the most common gadgets, and its slightly increased to 60 percent in the 1940 and keeps getting higher until 1960. After that it went down in the 1980 and reached a peak of 75 percent in the 2019. Another gadgets that given in the chart are refrigerator and vacuum cleaner, both of them reached a peak of 100 percent in the 2019. while in the 1920 none of the households used refrigerator, about 30 percent used the vacuum cleaner. As you can see from the chart both of the fridge and refrigerator gradually increased each year and remain steady in the last few years.

On the second chart, the longest numbers of hours of housework is in the 1920 which 50 hours a week, and it went down sharply in 1940 and continued to decrease until 1980, it remain steady until 2000, and reached its lowest point with the shortest hours which is 10 hours per week in the 2019.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-12-17 nguyendangquang.aspect 73 view
2024-03-13 MinyiChu 67 view
2024-03-11 oanhlilies 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 417, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ched a peak of 100 percent in the 2019. while in the 1920 none of the households used...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'remains'?
Suggestion: remains
...nd continued to decrease until 1980, it remain steady until 2000, and reached its lowe...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1180.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 257.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59143968872 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35533619545 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470817120623 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.9904745498 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.125 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134045880951 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065202835559 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553945210393 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958240168672 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545143898617 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.