Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have,but,in fact,it is a good quality for a person to have.
We live in a society where we are judged not only by the decisions that we make but also by the amount of time that we use to make those decisions. People mostly argue against the advantages of the fact that certain individuals take an extended amount of time to review all their options and make a decision, but in my opinion allocating enough time to a decision is as important as the quality of the decision itself. By taking time, we can approach a problem with a different mind-set and observe different aspects of the problem.
First of all, it is self-evident that humans make different decisions based on their emotional state. When we are happy and euphoric, we tend to make decisions that are impulsive and seem more enjoyable. While when one is sad, he tend to be less optimistic about the outcome of a certain decision. Thus, it is of utter importance to make decisions that are made when one is emotionally stable. This is possible only if one is able to take the time to enter a stable emotional state.
Secondly, there are always multiple aspects to problems than initially comes to mind. There are differnt aspects to every problem and an instant glance at it will not reveal enough information that one needs to consider. For instance, a friend asks you to join them on a vacation while you have not been to a vacation for over a year andd they also propose to pay for everything. Firstly, it might feel appealing because you have not had a vacation and really need one but after observing the fact that you might have to take permission from your employer or find someone to take care of your pet. Thus, taking time to observe different features of a decision is of great significance.
To conclude, patience when making a decision is a virtuous quality to anybody. Those who make rushed decisions with little considerations for the consequences or with impulsivity are always doomed to face negative consequences. Consequently, it is really important to devote time for the process of making important decisions.
- Taking a lot of time to make an important decision is often viewed as a bad quality for a person to have but in fact it is a good quality for a person to have 60
- The yellow crazy ant is one of the world s most destructive invasive species species that are not native to an area but rather introduced to it It has spread to many regions of Earth and caused great damage to native ecosystems In recent decades the crazy 85
- The supposed voyage of Brendan the navigator from Ireland to North America 81
- The cave paintings of Lascaux in southwestern France date to around 15 000 B C E and are among the finest examples of prehistoric art known 3
- Native to Europe and Asia cheatgrass is an invasive species of grass that is causing problems in North American fields The plant quickly dominates fields that it has invaded and drives out other plants This can cause among other problems severe damage to 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... but also by the amount of time that we use to make those decisions. People mostly ...
^^^
Line 3, column 231, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'tends'.
Suggestion: tends
...re enjoyable. While when one is sad, he tend to be less optimistic about the outcome...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74929577465 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71887755876 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498591549296 0.524837075471 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3763305789 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.375 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1875 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 5.45110844103 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30055514205 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937027002322 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659568717192 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180579216929 0.150856017488 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527301495517 0.0645574589148 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.