Some people believe that people have the right to university education, and the government should make it free no matter what their financial background. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a more persuasive argument that all people have the right to attend college and the local authority should make no payment for tuition about their base economic and financial. In this essay, I totally agree with the statement for reasons as follows.
On the one hand, one of the ways to help students concentrate more on learning is that the government should limit their tuition for them. Because, when the students don’t have to pay any fee, they do not need to find a job and do it while they are studying. As a result, it makes them more focused on their education path and they can be awarded more achievements and more degrees. Secondly, there are many students who are in difficult circumstances so they do not have enough money to attend college entrance to university. That is why the authorities should cut down the fee for learning at university. Therefore, they can go to the college that they want to go to. For example, some people who have good qualifications and high knowledge, will not be admitted to the university unless the government free tuition for them. That is really unfair.
On the other hand, paying fees when studying at university or college is necessary. When students are supported by the government, they can rely on this. Because they always think that they do not have to pay any fee for learning, they will not concentrate on their learning. If they do not have to pay tuition, they will become less self-motivated. Next, the schools have to pay a lot of fees for facilities, equipment so people who want to study in a good environment have to pay tuition to the government.
In conclusion, there are both positive and negative aspects. but I take my own stance that the government should pay fees for students because it brings advantages to all universities, authorities, and students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-30 | nphthao296 | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 64, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...are both positive and negative aspects. but I take my own stance that the governmen...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78056426332 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76591014678 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489028213166 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6284247523 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7058823529 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7647058824 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174931755881 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568699640588 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530021768047 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114796544472 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530716340357 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.58950901804 87% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.