The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed-line phones from 1994 to 2004.
The line graph provides information about the proportion of people in Africa who subscribed to mobile and fixed line phones between 1994 and 2004.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of people for both fixed and mobile, with the most dramatic rise being seen in the figures for mobile. In addition, fixed generally had the highest figures over the given period, but it was surpassed by mobile from 2001 onwards.
The proportion of subscribers in mobile started at 0.06% in 1994, after which it saw an increase gradually to 1% in 1999. Similar changes can be seen in the figure for fixed, which grew slightly from 1.7% at the beginning of the period to 2.5% until 2000.
Approximately 2.5% of the fixed line mobiles in Africa in 1994, with a subsequent slow increase in the following year and a final increase to 3.1 in 2004. Conversely, the figures for mobile increased rapidly from 2% to 3%, surpassing the fixed in 2001, followed by a rapid rise to 8.8% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | anhminhbnvn1 | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | Hoaianh | view | |
| 2022-04-03 | hieunguyen2204 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-03 | hieunguyen2204 | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 78
- Task 1 The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in Glasgow in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 822.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98181818182 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60958183535 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630303030303 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.87413003 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.55555555556 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332613786366 0.215688989381 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106478421235 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104624315516 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195362505385 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0789036178978 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.