The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed-line phones from 1994 to 2004.
The line graph provides information about the proportion of people in Africa who subscribed to mobile and fixed line phones between 1994 and 2004.
Overall, there was an upward trend in the percentage of people for both fixed and mobile, with the most dramatic rise being seen in the figures for mobile. In addition, fixed generally had the highest figures over the given period, but it was surpassed by mobile from 2001 onwards.
The proportion of subscribers in mobile started at 0.06% in 1994, after which it saw an increase gradually to 1% in 1999. Similar changes can be seen in the figure for fixed, which grew slightly from 1.7% at the beginning of the period to 2.5% until 2000.
Approximately 2.5% of the fixed line mobiles in Africa in 1994, with a subsequent slow increase in the following year and a final increase to 3.1 in 2004. Conversely, the figures for mobile increased rapidly from 2% to 3%, surpassing the fixed in 2001, followed by a rapid rise to 8.8% at the end of the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-19 | anhminhbnvn1 | 11 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | nguyenanhkhoi1702 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-07 | Hoaianh | view | |
| 2022-04-03 | hieunguyen2204 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-03 | hieunguyen2204 | 78 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of people in Africa subscribing to mobile and fixed line phones from 1994 to 2004 78
- Task 1 The chart below gives information about levels of education by age range in Glasgow in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nning of the period to 2.5% until 2000. Approximately 2.5% of the fixed line mob...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 834.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71186440678 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49873407893 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564971751412 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 13.8032826619 43.030603864 32% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.142857143 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375246890136 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179700078873 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.173188043841 0.0843802449381 205% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255083978341 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189657194841 0.0819641961636 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.