The chart below shows the annual number of rentals and sales in various formats of films from a particular star between 2002 and 2011 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Provided is the bar chart comparing the annual figure of rentals and sales (In a variety of formats) of films from a specific store during the 9-year period from 2002. Overall, The data clearly communicate that an ascending train was recorded in the number of Blu-ray sales why that of rentals and VHS sales witnessed A reverse. Additionally, the figure of DVD sales experienced a period of volatility.
As can be seen from the graph it was not until 2007 that Blu-ray appeared in market sales. The number of Blue Ray sales Increased by 10,000 to 13,000 during the Course of 4 years from 2007. Despite having a moderate growth the quantity of Blu-ray sold was the fewest compared to other formats.
In contrast, there was a drop in the number of rentals and VHS sales. To be specific, a significant decrease of 135,000 from 185,000 was recorded in the figure of rentals in the meantime. Although rentals experienced a considerable fall, it still remained its lead as one of the two most favourite forms. Similarly, The quality of VHS sales Declined sharply by 75,000 from 85,000 between 2002 and 2005. It is notable that it completely disappeared after 2005.
From 2002 to 2007 DVD was more and more liked as the number of DVD sales had a dramatic rise from 48,000 and reached its peak at over 210,000 in 2007. Subsequently, The figure of DVD sales decreased slightly to 180,000 in the course of five years later but it still continued to be the most popular film format in 2011.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-25 | 0366903403 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... experienced a period of volatility. As can be seen from the graph it was not u...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...Ray sales Increased by 10,000 to 13,000 during the Course of 4 years from 2007. Despite having a mod...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, still, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 261.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70498084291 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54557841484 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513409961686 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3986799943 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4615384615 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190667428 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732304750573 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615430773158 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127296568772 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571613195173 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.