The chart below shows information about average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with average house prices in 1989.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart compares average house prices in five different cities during a period of 13 years from 1989. On the whole, it can clearly be seen that the costs of average home decreased between 1990 and 1995, while on the other hand, the prices in most of cities increased from 1996 to 2002. In addition, London experienced the greatest average price over the 13-year period.
To begin with, over the 5 years after 189, the costs in Tokyo and London fell significantly by 7% in comparison with 1989 average, whereas New York house prices saw a drop by 5% at the same time. By contrast, average home exp...
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-29 | albertonian | 73 | view |
2016-07-28 | Daniel2016 | 78 | view |
2014-11-27 | indermann91@ymail.com | 80 | view |
2014-05-16 | kya | 80 | view |
2014-05-12 | kaj | 60 | view |
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports faculties. Others, However say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. 80
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree with these views? 70
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 80
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 80
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 186 200
No. of Characters: 819 1000
No. of Different Words: 100 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.693 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.403 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.354 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 33 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 20 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 12 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.919 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.444 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.452 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.607 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.087 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4