The table below shows the prices of a cup of coffee in 6 cities in Australia in 2010 and 2014. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The given table illustrates the expenses of each coffee in six cities in Australia from 2010 to 2014.
It is clear that almost fee increased slightly whilst the figure of Brisbane coffee kept the advance unchanged. The price of Melbourne coffee experienced the most significant change over the period shown.
Melbourne was the city that had the highest proportion of change with 20.8%, the expense in 2010 was $2.4 and in 2014 was 2.9, rised $0.5. The lower figure was that the Sydney coffee price comprised 13.2% change with $2.9 and $3.7 in 2010 and 2014 respectively. This data was significant lower than the figure that of Melbourne coffee expense with almost 8% of the cost change.
The price of Perth coffee was higher than the figure that of Adelaide coffee fee accounted for 7.1% and 6.95% respectively. Canbrrela seemed to be the city that had the lowest figure with only 6.25% change and 0.1% increased from $2.6 to $2.7 while Brisbane figure was unchange with $2.25 in both of timelines.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | 100 | view |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | view | |
| 2023-04-10 | anhminhbnvn1 | view |
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer To what extent do you agree or disagree write introduction
- The plans show how a coastal land has developed into a coastal park 71
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 84
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 31
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 821.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80116959064 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42752757349 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.989038948 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.285714286 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.28571428571 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157889481147 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902684845713 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725680047628 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124479693091 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711729791959 0.0819641961636 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.