Human are damaging the environment
What are the reasons?
What can the government do to address these problems?
What can individual people do?
Humans have a significant impact on the destruction of the environment. This essay will analyse the causes and what government and individual people should implement to tackle the issue.
To begin with, massive exhaust emissions are the first culprit. In more detail, tall smogs of factories pumping clouds of smoke into the sky, carbon dioxide poured out from traffic, chemical waste poured into rivers or greenhouse gas emissions are not strange to many people. These are also said to rise and burn a hole in the Earth's ozone layer and global warming. Moreover, a throw-away society is another reason. To be more specific, numerous single-use products are thrown away by small humans day by day, although few of them may decompose themselves, many are non-biodegradable products lying in the ground, rivers and even seas.
To improve the ecosystem, these promising solutions should be applied by both the authorities and persons. On the one hand, for the government, implementing a pollution threshold for factories is a long-lasting measure. To explain, if a company produces more pollutants than allowed limit, it will be fined and that payment will be contributed to conservation organisations. Thus, industrial companies would take necessary measures to reduce their waste. In addition, improving public transportations is another method to alleviate environmental degradation. In other words, habitants should be encouraged to use mass transports which are safe and clean instead of private cars. This may help to lower the amount of harmful gases per passenger. On the other hand, each person should take action to mitigate the environment contamination. First, promoting eco-friendly lifestyle choices is a hopeful remedy. To put it simply, individuals should use reusable and biodegradable products, instead. Also, they should also keep their carbon footprint to a minimum. Additionally, people need to be more proactive to use renewable energy. Wind, solar power which may not have many pollutants, for example, should be put to use.
To sum up, human beings are causing severe damage to the earth by various means. Nevertheless, the issues could be efficiently ameliorated if the authority and public are ready to work together to achieve a common goal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-15 | Lê Hồng | 61 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | levanhoan123 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | paula_ngy08 | 89 | view |
| 2021-08-02 | paula_ngy08 | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site 73
- The diagrams below show stages in the development of simple cooking equipment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The pie charts below show comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years
- Learning to play team sports is an important part of a child s education Do you agree or disagree Give reason for your answer And include any relevant experience from your own knowledge 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...e-use products are thrown away by small humans day by day, although few of them may de...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, in addition, in other words, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1921.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39606741573 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01666430681 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637640449438 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.7319266093 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3181818182 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1818181818 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.083880768504 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239416156697 0.084324248473 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428635171834 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0720693026756 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0694915229358 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.74 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.