Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problem presented in the passage.
The reading passage casts doubts on whether some of the paintings that are claimed to be the works of Rembrandt are really his work or not. To illustrate this, the reading passage uses an example of his famous work known as Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. There are three reasons as to which the passage concludes that it is not the work of Rembrandt. First, there is inconsistency in clothing but Rembrandt was famous for attention to details in clothing styles. Second, Rembrandt was master of light and shadow but there is inconsistency here also. Third, no painting of Rembrandt used a panel of wood glued together but this one did. However, the lecture answers to all these points which are discussed below.
First, the lecture states that the fur collar was added about 100 years after the painting was first made. This was directly evident from the X-Ray research done in the labs. The fur collar was added in top of the original painting. The reason to do so might be to increase the value of the painting further.
Second, the lecture mentions that the X-Ray research also showed the original painting. On closely examining the newly revealed parts of the painting, it was observed that the dark fur was indeed a light colored clothing before the former was added. It is because of this light colored clothing that illuminated the face.
Lastly, the addition of the new dark fur collar was attached by gluing the wood panels together. It was done in order to enlarge the paintaing and make it more valuable. Furthermore, it was observed that the tree source used to make original wood panel was similar to the many other arts by Rembrandt.
To conclude, as evident from the reasons stated above, the lecture clearly explains and answers to each of the doubts and question that arises in the reading passage regarding the autenticity of Rembrandt's painting.
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage 73
- In an effort to improve our employees productivity we should implement electronic monitoring of employees Internet use from their workstations Employees who use the Internet inappropriately from their workstations need to be identified and punished if we 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Claim No act is done purely for the benefit of others Reason All actions even those that seem to be done for other people are based on self interest 58
- Some people believe it is often necessary even desirable for political leaders to withhold information from the public Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 45, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...reading passage casts doubts on whether some of the paintings that are claimed to be the wo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 562, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
... shadow but there is inconsistency here also. Third, no painting of Rembrandt used a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, lastly, really, regarding, second, so, third, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 30.3222958057 158% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82769230769 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43566401041 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489230769231 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5789234341 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0555555556 21.698381199 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06452816374 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0969570389821 0.272083759551 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0339359535483 0.0996497079465 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473700419725 0.0662205650399 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0605581051688 0.162205337803 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493357264445 0.0443174109184 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.3589403974 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.