The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016.
The bar chart elucidates the stock price of several tech brands within six consecutive years.
In general, while Facebook's stock price gradually increased, Yahoo showed the reverse. The Google stock price stayed low and showed changes throughout the years.
From 2011 to 2013, a constant rise was seen in the Facebook stock price by approximately 4,000, whereas the Yahoo stock price dipped moderately to above 5,000. The figure of Apple surged steeply back to 7,000 after skyrocketing by more than tenfolds. Also, the stock price owned by Google remained the lowest and showed no changes at slightly above 0.
In the next three years, the stock price of Yahoo still continued to dip by 3000, after showing no changes in a short period. Whereas, Facebook's stock price kept increasing by 6,000, becoming the most preferred tech company to invest in. A fluctuation was seen in the Apple stock price, while Google stock price remained steady at the bottom of the list.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-09 | aikzat | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | naufalrahman96 | view | |
| 2021-09-20 | naufalrahman96 | view | |
| 2021-09-20 | naufalrahman96 | 85 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | jenmin | 64 | view |
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 61
- Universities should take the same number of men and women in each major To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- In some countries people encourage students to find part time jobs while some people don t Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, whereas, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 816.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06832298137 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39427902422 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.9907389539 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280607972892 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131131048534 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516420941141 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186401508884 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288158154167 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.