Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I believe, interacting with the project partners and colleagues during the execution process of a project leads to better quality works. I will discuss my reasonings in the following essay.
First, a face to face discussion leads to better understandings, all involved personell can be present and talk about their issues and ideas. members of the team can explain their points by using different ways and objects available during a face to face meeting. For example, in my time as a masters student whenever I went to my advisor to talk about issues concerning my thesis I would ask my questions and he would explain the issue and even draw different charts to help me understand the problem. He could even figure out if I understood the point by my facial expressions in many occasions elaborating on the issue after pointing out that my face was blank.
Second, during interactive conversations there are faster responses to questions, while in many occasions the answer to emails are recieved hours maybe even days after they are asked. taking one of my professors as an example, I would show them my results and he would comment on different issues there and then, but during the pandemic I had to contact him using emails. I would send several emails to them asking their opinion about a part of my project but the answer would come after weeks had passed pointing out issues, this would delay my work by a lot taking into consideration that I had went onto the wrong path in the weeks there was no response.
Third, when the communication is done in person there is minimal filtering. When emailing somebody we filter out points that have low probability of being important like an idea that we think is not plausible but would have considered saying it during a face to face discussion. many such ideas actually may be ingenieous but due to self filtering no one would hear them. for example, one of my friends had an idea for a data mining application but did not talk about it until a month later during the monthly meeting. in the meeting the boss was so impressed by the idea saying that it would have made a bigger difference if it was brought up only a week sooner and they would have saved a lot of time by applying it.
Based on the above reasonings communicating with colleagues in person is better than communicating by email.
- These days if you pick up a newspaper or turn on the TV or radio you may hear or read about the advantages of driverless cars also called self driving or autonomous cars The technology is simple to understand using sensors and computers these cars can dri 80
- Although the sale of rhinoceros horns is illegal worldwide rhinoceroses Rhinos are commonly poached hunted illegally for their horns which can be sold for tens of thousands of dollars per kilogram Rhino horns are so valuable that one type of rhino is alre 85
- Amtrak is an intercity train service currently owned by the United States government There are a number of critics who believe that the government should not own Amtrak and that Amtrak should be sold to a privately owned company These critics put forward 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e mail they will produce better work for the project Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- TPO 48 In recent years many frog species around the world have declined in numbers or even gone extinct due to changes in their environment These population declines and extinctions have serious consequences for the ecosystems in which frogs live for exam 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Members
... and talk about their issues and ideas. members of the team can explain their points by...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 293, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'masters'' or 'master's'?
Suggestion: masters'; master's
...e meeting. For example, in my time as a masters student whenever I went to my advisor t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Taking
...s maybe even days after they are asked. taking one of my professors as an example, I w...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 597, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[6]
Message: Note: went is a past participle of "wend". Did you mean 'gone' (past participle of "go")?
Suggestion: gone
...ot taking into consideration that I had went onto the wrong path in the weeks there ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: CONFUSION_OF_OUR_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'our'?
Suggestion: our
...ering. When emailing somebody we filter out points that have low probability of bei...
^^^
Line 4, column 279, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ng it during a face to face discussion. many such ideas actually may be ingenieous ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...face to face discussion. many such ideas actually may be ingenieous but due to se...
^^
Line 4, column 373, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
... self filtering no one would hear them. for example, one of my friends had an idea ...
^^^
Line 4, column 520, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...month later during the monthly meeting. in the meeting the boss was so impressed b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, may, second, so, then, third, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 43.0788530466 109% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 52.1666666667 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1936.0 1977.66487455 98% => OK
No of words: 413.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68765133172 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65148981806 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506053268765 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.3510471234 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.066666667 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5333333333 20.6045352989 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138817864475 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642889670909 0.076458572812 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669904793266 0.0737576698707 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124920802979 0.150856017488 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867017561665 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.1575268817 124% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 10.9000537634 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.