“The desire of corporations to maximize profits creates conflict with the general welfare of the nation at large.”
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations or reading.
According to the prompt, industries in corporate sectors tend to ignore general welfare of the nation while tending to gain maximum profits. I support the cause mentioned by the speaker: corporations many a times focuses more on personal benefits and keeping many important factors at bay.
Firstly, when we talk about national welfare, it doesn't consists only of consumers but also the natural resources, environmental balance, fauna and wildlife of the respective nation. Instances such as cheaper raw materials, natural excavation for resources, avoiding proper waste segregation by these corporate sectors comes to harm everyone in the end of the day. Many companies tend to stay away from green technology or ecofriendly production or waste management techniques in order to maximize their personal gains. Majorly, the reason why a greater part of corporate sectors still haven't adopted to ecofriendly technology lies with the fact that, they curb a part of their profit gaining system.
Decrease in quality of product or production method, is a significant example of malpractice used to increase profit gain by industries. While there is a significant competition out there in todays world, it is important to stand out while maintaining gross profits. These vicious cycles of profit gain is obtained by compromising on either quality of production, getting cheaper raw materials, etc. At the end it is a harm to both human welfare and environmental welfare of any nation.
There might also be some positive outcome of these desires by corporate sectors. Competition has been the mother of new and improvised products. In the recent era of modernization and public awareness - companies are slowly shifting towards products or services which are a win win for both- economy and natural balance. Example of these could a shift towards vegan products for a sector of population which considers it brutal to consume meat.
To sum up the argument, corporate sector's attraction to maximum profit should be monitored by aware citizens. They will have to keep national welfare as a priority, in order to avoid strict legal actions or public enrage: otherwise stated correctly they would harm the nations as well as the entire world's welfare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-16 | Vaishnavi Dixit | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2018-03-13 | Adarsh | 100 | view |
| 2018-03-13 | Adarsh | 16 | view |
| 2017-12-18 | Md17 | 50 | view |
- Issue3 Scandal are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position 67
- Last year PrepUp had record enrollment in their test prep courses but yearly profits fellby nearly 30 percent To the contrary TopPreparation had comparable enrollment to the year before with profits rising by approximately 20 percent This discrepancy 53
- Over the past year the Crust Copper Company CCC has purchased over 10 000 square miles of land in the tropical nation of West Fredonia Mining copper on this land will inevitably result in pollution and since West Fredonia is the home of several endangered 69
- Regulators and policymakers should respond to potential environmental threats even before the information is fully known or concrete How would you rate the accuracy of the above statement Support your position with reasons and examples 79
- Davis Technologies a computer chip maker could solve its problem of declining sales by dropping its prices This would make Davis better able to compete in the highly competitive computer chip market The sales of chips would increase and this would substan 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...when we talk about national welfare, it doesnt consists only of consumers but also the...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
...er waste segregation by these corporate sectors comes to harm everyone in the end of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 587, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...greater part of corporate sectors still havent adopted to ecofriendly technology lies ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...important to stand out while maintaining gross profits. These vicious cycles of p...
^^
Line 7, column 275, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: win
...owards products or services which are a win win for both- economy and natural balance. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sectors'' or 'sector's'?
Suggestion: sectors'; sector's
.... To sum up the argument, corporate sectors attraction to maximum profit should be ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, well, while, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31652661064 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84878406958 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579831932773 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1175611938 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.625 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162009057017 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047091977371 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325123247337 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0825792120129 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180891147843 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.