some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Ohers, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety
Opinion is divided as to whether harsh penalties should be the primary strategy for reducing traffic incidents or not. I think that such punishments ought to be used in conjunction with others to effectively lower accident rates.
Strict punishments can serve as a powerful deterrent against reckless drivers. in fact, a growing body of studies has indicated that most motorists are more terrified of receiving costly fines, which can total many thousands of dollars, or having their license suspended than they are of inflicting injuries on other road users. Therefore, were there no severe penalties, dangerous drivers would continue to engage in reckless driving. More importantly, revenues generated from fines can be utilized to upgrade the road infrastructure, which is also of great importance to road safety.
To achieve the best results, however, a number of following approaches should be considered. Firstly, it is important to improve the effectiveness of traffic safety education. This means to be a certified driver, candidates are required to undergo rigorous driving tests that are designed to develop safe driving practices, such as being alert of potential traffic hazards or handling driving aggressiveness. As a result, motorists are trained to proactively shun collisions. Furthermore, public transportation needs to be invested and subsidized so that citizens are encouraged to use it more frequently instead of private vehicles, which gradually reduces not only traffic congestion but also road incidents.
In conclusion, in order to curb the increase in accident rates, diverse initiatives, such as heavy fines, driving instruction and public transportation should be coordinated. otherwise, there would not be a real decline in crashes.
- In some countries people spend long hours at work Why does this happen and is it positive or negative development 61
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- as the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
- Do you agree that modern technology has given us more leisure time than before 90
- some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents Ohers however believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
Opinion is divided as to whether harsh penalties should be the primary s...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ful deterrent against reckless drivers. in fact, a growing body of studies has ind...
^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Otherwise
...c transportation should be coordinated. otherwise, there would not be a real decline in c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, as to, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1506.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6404494382 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1149522501 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65543071161 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7959930093 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.846153846 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5384615385 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309391210817 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956001382089 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578308439263 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171873845694 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527752850993 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.