In many countries, people buy a range of household goods.
Is it a positive or negative development?
Since the industrial revolution, humans have acquired the ability to mass-produce anything they need, which has given rise to the concerns over the substantial quantity of products one has possessed. Although such phenomenon is a positive sign of increased manufacturing capacity as well as living standards, this could result in impulsive buying.
It is apparent that the continual expansion of industries and electronic commerce as well as the ease of giving credit are driven by the insatiable desire of growing middle class for buying. Such enormous growth in purchases has consequently generated greater profits for businesses to reinvest in their production capacity, thus forming a positive feedback loop. Furthermore, the enhanced purchasing power is, to a certain extent, an indication of augmented average income. To illustrate, in the past, to be able to possess a TV required an individual to scrimp and save over a few months, whereas for the time being, such consumer product only accounts for a moderate amount of one’s salary.
The mass production, nevertheless, means a distinct possibility that a large amount of merchandise could remain unsold for a period of time. Therefore, many concerns have opted for built-in obsolescence and simultaneously used advertisements to incentivize consumers to spend more even on item of little utility to them. For example, multiple aggregators have been offering numerous discounts and utilizing celebrity endorsement to manipulate consumer spending to a degree that many young buyers have bought items that they never use. More significantly, such trend could lead to an improvident use of finances among later generations with the result that some youngsters have accumulated huge debts. As a result, it is safe to say the existing consumerism is more of detrimental nature than beneficial one.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that not only can consumerism promote the overall production but also somewhat reflects the wealth of a society; however, it can lead them to develop unwise buying habits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-13 | vidung | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
- many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past why is that so Does this development have more advantages or disadvantages 92
- some believe that countries around the world should have a moral obligation to help each other while others think it is unncessary because money is misused by the governments that receive it Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- Some people believe that new buildings should be built in traditional styles To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 95
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for a country Discuss both views and give your own opinion 95
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road system Some people think that the government should pay for this Others however think that the users should pay for the cost Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...f merchandise could remain unsold for a period of time. Therefore, many concerns have opted fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1750.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46875 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08534844061 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653125 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.4150457305 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.833333333 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3333333333 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0540827134618 0.244688304435 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0184014207045 0.084324248473 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236265421335 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359435166883 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212270045364 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.