Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Partnership use disciplines exercise events to advertising their product. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of companies use major sporting events to promote their product. First, sporting are believed that favorite activities of people and company’s advertising is the important part of product. This sporting support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall sports lover rate but also sports are spread more widely with the people thank you the company’s advertising. Second, the company’s advertising about sports events would probably result in a greater supply of highly sports workers and everyone can know importance of sports, which benefits society in the long run. In fact, it is acknowledged that sports is an important and companies use sports events to promote their product is very perfect, because everyone can know their product but also can know more about other sports by their advertising.
Nevertheless, the resultant problems would be far more significant than the sports events to promote their product. First, company’s advertising about sport events would likely correspond with a tremendous sports strain in a country. Almost, company use sport events for their product but they don’t research about sports world, meaning that there would be less real sport events have organization for sports lover because company in nowadays just focus on profit even companies will have many bad comments. Second, company’s advertising about sport events would tempt many young people including those who are not sports inclined or show no interest in sport pursuit, thereby adding great burdens for sports or athlete and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more suitable sport paths. It, instead, would be a more advertising viable option if the resources were focused on supporting expertise that the company really understands and wants to convey.
I were discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, I agree with this above argument.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- The maps show the changes a bookstore in 200 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features relevant 73
- In some countries more and more are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reason for this How can people can research this 73
- The bar chart describes the percentage of men and women doing housework tasks and average time in a country in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below give the number of people employed in five types of work in a certain region in Australia in 2001 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many men and women are making the decision to have children later in life Why is this trend occurring What are the impacts of this development on both family and society 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
... tends not only to increase the overall sports lover rate but also sports are spread m...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: nowadays
...zation for sports lover because company in nowadays just focus on profit even companies wil...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: PERS_PRONOUN_AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: Did you mean 'was'?
Suggestion: was
...lly understands and wants to convey. I were discussed both sides of the argument. I...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, nevertheless, really, second, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1790.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47400611621 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65849686994 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522935779817 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.080364517 49.4020404114 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.857142857 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422669188367 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17440659865 0.084324248473 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121996882771 0.0667982634062 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218521985377 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15576386358 0.056905535591 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.