Companies use major sporting events to promote their products. Some people think it has a negative effect on sport in general. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, there are more and more agencies organizing major sporting events to advertise their commodities. Nonetheless, some individuals believe it will bring tremendous consequences to sports generally. From my perspective, I strongly disagree about that statement.
Advertising goods through sponsoring sporting events is considered to bring numerous advantages for those organizations. To begin with, it is believed to gain a huge profit for promotion businesses. With high viewing from viewers on the social media sites and attractive competitions, companies would profit from that advertising and gain advocacy from sports fans. For example, Pepsi has gained a big revenue from promoting their beverages by Ronandol in an interview sports and it received numerous orders from that occasion. As a result, it will enhance corporations’ brands and revenues from product commercials through sporting occasions.
Not only does it benefit firms, but it is also advantageous for sporting attendees in terms of providing sports supplies. There would be no fear of the lack of rehearsing funds and participants will be guaranteed from supplying sports items to ensure to focus on competitions. For instance, Tokyo Olympic 2021 supplied a lot of sports tools for candidates, which facilitated them to have one of the best experiences to be ready for attending their matches. Thereby, sporting candidates would be ensured to have better experiences regarding sports facilities and supplies.
In conclusion, it cannot be denied that there are a large number of benefits not only for advertising organizations but also for sports competitors. In my view, I agree that promoting products through major sporting events would boost companies' revenues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-26 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- More and more parents are allowing their children to play on computers and tablets as they think that children should learn technology skills Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 58
- Many students now have the opportunity to study in other countries Studying abroad may bring some benefits to some students but it also has a significant number of disadvantages Which one is more outweigh 73
- More and more people decide to eat healthy food and exercise regularly What are the reasons for this trend What can be done to encourage more people to eat healthier and exercise 92
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The money spent by governments on space programmes would be better spent on vital public services such as schools and hospitals To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ion, it cannot be denied that there are a large number of benefits not only for advertising organ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59176029963 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1107704268 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7781659533 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251397386345 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102543696159 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667954566881 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175828413469 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380965055412 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.