In many countries, paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common. Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages?
Nowadays, technology is changing our everyday routines and is revolutionizing the way we live.
The most obvious one is the smartphones being programmed with various applications which compacts items like a calculator, camera, and calendar in a small device. Paying with cell phones has also become dominant all over the world and is putting an end to using the cards and cash which I believe is advantageous.
On the one hand, you will definitely have a problem paying with your cell phone when it is out of charge or there is no cellular data available. The wallets in cell phones or the bank applications are also at risk of being hacked or being out of service for hours during the day. What is more, senior citizens are not used to working with smartphones and this trend will be challenging for them. They may prefer to stay at home instead of being in society and becoming more introverted and depressed.
On the other hand, paying with electronic wallets removes the need to carry many cash or credit/debit cards wherever you go which minimizes the risk of theft or missing. As people always have their cell phones in their packet they never miss paying for their shopping. More importantly, in today's life, individuals are looking for the quickest way of doing their tasks, and one common task is shopping. Paying with a cell phone wallet is faster since the cashier does not need to count every cent and dollar or there is no need to enter the pin code of the card each time or try to find your credit/debit card among a number of membership cards.
In conclusion, substitution of electronic wallets with cards and cash has more benefits than the drawbacks as it removes the need for keeping and carrying many cards and money in pocket and speeds up the process of checkout.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-16 | thadsha1999 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | yasaman-pooshidani | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-11 | minhhh123 | 84 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | bilal_chaudhry | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-23 | shadow1222 | 73 | view |
- some people prefer to go and visit the tourist attractions where there are many people others like the ones with fewer people which one do you prefer 73
- In many countries paying for things using mobile phone apps is becoming increasingly common Does this development have more advantages or more disadvantages 73
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure, successful future. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- Do you agree or disagree In order to succeed in doing a new job the ability to adapt onself to the new enviroment is more important than the excellent knowledge of this job 76
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading passage 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, may, so, in conclusion, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71565495208 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59819259932 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546325878594 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.8394512554 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0833333333 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208966306364 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0773638389047 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462337308151 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980995592749 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615467360178 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.