the line graph shows the production of paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood in the Uk from 1980 to 2000.
The given line graph illustrates the amount of paper and packaging, sawn-wood and wood pulp produced in the UK between 1980 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that paper and packaging production had a the most a significant rise and remained in the first place during the period compared to the other two categoriesfigures, ending the period in first place. On the other hand, the figures for sawn-wood and wood pulp experienced went through a downward trend and landed in last place.
According to the graph, from 1980 to 1990, paper and packaging witnessed went through a considerable rise, increasing from 230 to 250 million tonnes. During the next 10 years, this figure witnessed a significant increase to a high of its peak at 350 million tonnes of paper produced.
By contrast, the amount of sawn-wood and wood pulp both saw a decrease. From the year 1980 to 1990, sawn-wood production dropped from its highest point at 200 million tonnes to around 150 million tonnes before bottomingbottomed at 130 million tonnes in 2000. Similarly to the figure mentioned above, the amount of wood pulp produced in the first ten years fell gradually from its top at 180 million tonnes to its lowest point at 150. After that, the production of wood pulp slowly rose to 160 million tonnes in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 62, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: a; the
...that paper and packaging production had a the most a significant rise and remained in...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xperienced went through a downward trend and landed in last place. According to...
^^
Line 4, column 260, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...bottomed at 130 million tonnes in 2000. Similarly to the figure mentioned above, the amou...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, similarly, in the first place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73149672893 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6768921408 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4444444444 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.23603664747 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447922893435 0.215688989381 208% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214571498496 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15505433685 0.0843802449381 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297200053404 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174955859755 0.0819641961636 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.