Directions: Read the question below. You have 30 minutes to plan, write,and revise your
essay. Typically,an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words.
Question:
National government can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environment. Which ONE
of the following three actions do you think is MOST important for a nation's government to take to
protect the natural environment and why?
-Fund research to develop environmentally friendly energy sources, such as solar or wind power
-Preserve natural places such as forests and protect native wildlife species (animals) that live there
-Pass and enforce laws to prevent the pollution of air and water by big companies and industries
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As far as I am concerned, finding a new way to produce environmentally friendly energy sources would be essential to protect the natural environment. Because if we can solve the energy problem, other problems discussed could be solved naturally.
First, we cannot reproduce the current fossil energy, whose emission after burning is also harmful to the environment. The energy from solar energy or wind power will not produce any harmful components to the environment. Furthermore, the harvesting ratio of those energy sources is still low, meaning if we can improve the harvesting ratio, the total body of energy could be huge. And the energy prices would no longer be a problem for us.
Second, with new environmentally friendly energy sources, we can reduce the activities that might threaten the wildlife species. We do not need extra resources from nature. For example, in the rural areas of many countries, people would cut down trees to make meals or keep their houses warm. We can eliminate these behaviors if we have new energy sources because the new sources of energy would be much cheaper. Being able to reproduce them in large quantities, people would tend to use them instead of the low-efficient fire energy from the woods. In this way, the forest habitats for the wildlife could be preserved. If we can leverage solar power or other forms of recycling energy, the problem of protecting wildlife would be easier.
Third, the new type of energy can also help to tackle the harmful pollution from companies and industries. Many methods to reduce pollution are less favorable to the companies due to their high costs. For example, we can use electricity to disintegrate poisonous gases before emitting them. Yet the costs for this method are too high, and the companies are reluctant to do that. If we could produce the electricity from new types of environmentally friendly energy sources in large quantities and at cheap prices, the previous concerns would no longer exist. Since the cost of treating the pollution would be much lower, the companies and industries would be more willing to do it.
In summary, if we can solve the energy problem, the other two problems could be solved naturally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-08 | Rasika0511 | 3 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | wanhr | 52 | view |
| 2020-10-12 | jnp1999 | 42 | view |
| 2020-07-27 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-13 | 地狱博士后 | 70 | view |
- Directions Read the question below You have 30 minutes to plan write and revise your essay Typically an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words Question National government can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environme 3
- Directions Read the question below You have 30 minutes to plan write and revise your essay Typically an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words Question National government can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environme 52
- Directions Read the question below You have 30 minutes to plan write and revise your essay Typically an effective response will contain a minimum of 300 words Question National government can take a variety of actions to help protect the natural environme 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, second, so, still, third, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 9.8082437276 265% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03804347826 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7186899071 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489130434783 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 618.680645161 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1824486328 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7 100.406767564 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.6045352989 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0409189263289 0.236089414692 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0161286410431 0.076458572812 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0167553532683 0.0737576698707 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0290894212234 0.150856017488 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00847229437176 0.0645574589148 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.