Nowadays for many people the internet is replacing regular books. What do you think will happen in the future and what is your opinion about this trend?
In recent years, the usage of internet on the electronic gadgets has become quite popular among readers. Some people believe that the increasing use of the internet has made regular books redundant. However, others insist that the conventional method of reading paper books is the optimum way of learning and cannot be replaced by the internet or other sources. In my point of view, we will see more digitalization of the print media in the near future and the majority of the population will switch to electronic books and content.
First of all, the growing usage of mobiles and laptops among the youngsters has changed the way of reading and studying. A plethora of books and magazines are available on the internet free of cost. As a result of this, many universities and schools now have decided to allow students to use the internet in the classrooms and libraries. Besides that, eBooks are environment friendly as they eliminate the need to cut down trees for the production of paper books. Moreover, eBooks are easy to share as no parcels are required to deliver them from one place to another.
On the other hand, the traditional method of reading has its own benefits.Though books are heavy to carry and require a lot of care, readers can easily make notes and highlight keywords. Internet users are not able to do this. In addition to that, kids and school students learn faster by reading books rather than e-books. Books don’t need electricity and other required electric set ups to start reading. A recent report published in the UK elaborate that the people who read books possess better memory than those who use the internet.
To conclude, popularity of the internet reading has significantly increased among the readers. This changing trend has been accepted mostly by youngsters, while there are still many readers who believe in the conventional method of reading books. In my opinion, it is absolutely necessary to go with the flow as digital versions of books are the future as they are reliable, cost efficient and environment friendly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-04 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-04 | vishal sachdeva | 73 | view |
| 2019-02-07 | Minh Duc Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2018-12-14 | Ahnne123 | 84 | view |
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies. To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements? What measures can be taken to protect them 78
- Different people have different opinions regarding retirement age What factors should be considered while deciding retirement age 77
- Some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; others think there are some other ways. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Discuss the impact of computer games on young minds 58
- Organized tour to remote areas and community is increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 74, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Though
... method of reading has its own benefits.Though books are heavy to carry and require a ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 268, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
... of reading books. In my opinion, it is absolutely necessary to go with the flow as digital versions...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, while, in addition, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1720.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95677233429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67309980144 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550432276657 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0044615847 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.176470588 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58823529412 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205742514439 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659378678208 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482586207934 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123657570573 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325091132123 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.