Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The reading and the lecture are both about a fossil of a type of dinasaur that seems to had fether. The author of the reading feels that it is not acceptable that they contain feather. The lecture challenges this claim made by the author.She believes that the points that mentioned in the reading are unconvincing.
According to reading those lines in the fossils doesn't represent for feather. He says they might be due to the process that had happened after the dinasours death. This specific argument is challenged by the lecture. She claims those line are well presentig of feather existance. Additionally, she says they can't be because of their skin decomposition into fibers.
Secondly, the writer suggests that scientsts are not able to be sure about the part of the dinasour's anatomy the structures belongs to. The lecture, however, rebuts this by metioning that there is chemical difference between parts of their body. She goes on to say by measuring the amount of kind of protein which is called betacarotein they can recognize exact part.
Finally, the author posits that the function of the feather supposed to be just for fly or keeping them warm, while the feather was somewhere about their tail. In contrast, the lecture's position is some kind of animals uses this tail feathers for attracting their mate. Moreover, she notes that recently the scientist finds out that there was colorful parts of dinasours, so it can amplify the usage of this type of feather for displaying and catching attraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t acceptable that they contain feather. The lecture challenges this claim made by t...
^^^
Line 1, column 239, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: She
...hallenges this claim made by the author.She believes that the points that mentioned...
^^^
Line 2, column 49, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...g to reading those lines in the fossils doesnt represent for feather. He says they mig...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... existance. Additionally, she says they cant be because of their skin decomposition ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 13.8261648746 22% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1264.0 1977.66487455 64% => OK
No of words: 254.0 407.700716846 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97637795276 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.48103885553 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60181120354 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 618.680645161 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.6003584229 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9633022644 48.9658058833 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2857142857 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0358527146669 0.236089414692 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0140270346582 0.076458572812 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183051817396 0.0737576698707 25% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0205826428997 0.150856017488 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151698763485 0.0645574589148 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.