Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Most people in the world assume that facing new challenges and a variety of jobs during the day is more satisfying than performing the same job. Personally, I believe having diverse types of tasks in a day is better than a routine job. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, performing the same task is boring. In fact, while you have to do the same thing all day long, you might feel tired sooner because that same task becomes irritating after a while. Also, it can reduce the amount of productivity in general. Additionally, being occupied with the same work can make the workers feel depressed about their job because of few amount of excitement. My personal experience is a compelling illustration of this. When I was going to school, I remember that for one of my courses, I had to write the same paragraph over and over. Although it was beneficial at first, after a while, all the students feel tired and were reluctant to continue. Whereas if it consisted of different parts, that wouldn't be redundant after a while and could engage the students more.
Second, different types of tasks allow workers to be more creative. It means, because they are facing different kinds of situation, they have to see the problems from different aspects, which make them able to handle a new challenge better. Moreover, due to the duty's diversity, the workers can stay sharper during the day. For instance, I had the same situation once I was working in a company. The manager always tried to choose a new topic for design. Therefore, we always had to keep ourselves updated and aware of the new topic and this directly had its impact on the company level.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that various jobs in a day can satisfy the workers better. This is because of not becoming frustrated and because being more creative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-05 | Zmx_6 | 90 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | YasamanEsml | 70 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
| 2023-06-17 | Vivian Chang | 60 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours Use specific reasons and examples to support 60
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- It is commonly believed that in life success is not the most important thing It is more important to remain happy and optimistic when we fail Do you agree with this idea 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 3
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun amount seems to be countable; consider using: 'few amounts'.
Suggestion: few amounts
...el depressed about their job because of few amount of excitement. My personal experience i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 729, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...f it consisted of different parts, that wouldnt be redundant after a while and could en...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, whereas, while, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, in fact, in general, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 329.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71124620061 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56596889627 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537993920973 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9719317608 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5789473684 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3157894737 20.6045352989 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15789473684 5.45110844103 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232944293388 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655943585599 0.076458572812 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641452032082 0.0737576698707 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13328046489 0.150856017488 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338123844557 0.0645574589148 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.