The line graph gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.
The given line graph illustrates how many people paid a visit to three museums in London namely, British museum, Science museum and Natural History museum from June to September in 2013.
Overall, the British museum was the most-visited attraction while Science museum and Natural History museum witnessed the lowest number of visitors. In addition, all three museums had the lowest number of visitors in August.
Looking at the chart, in June, the British museum had the highest number of visitors, with this destination welcoming 600 thousand visitors. Moreover, there was a growth of 750 thousand visitors in this museum before decreasing dramatically to 500 thousand visitors from July to August. This figure, however, grew back to 650 thousand visitors in August.
Concerning the other museums, which followed the similar trend. The Natural history museum and Natural museum attracted 550 thousand and 400 thousand visitors, respectively in June. A month later, these two museums had approximately 380 thousand visitors each. Additionally, the Natural history museum remained stable in the number of visitors while the figure for the Science museum dropped progressively to 300 thousand visitors between July and August. The trend for these museums was upward with their figure ending with around 460 thousand visitors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-12 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | manggiess | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-16 | ThHuong | 87 | view |
| 2023-03-07 | snowacealex | 73 | view |
- Young people are often influenced in their behaviors and situations by others in the same age This is called peer pressure Do the disadvantages of peer pressure outweigh the advantage 89
- The line graph gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, moreover, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51960784314 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59611471451 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504901960784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 334.8 283.868780488 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6945556616 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.363636364 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5454545455 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298066619779 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125050670746 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950976589489 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213278791312 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863302937973 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.