Some people think that the use of mobile (cell) phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries, shop and on public transport. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Some people have suggested that the use of mobile phones be completely restricted in public areas such as in libraries, shops and on public transport. In my opinion, cell phones should not be banned as they can save lives in case of emergencies and can be put in a mode that will not disturb others while in public areas.
Mobile phones are our closest source of reaching out for help in case of an emergency. While in public areas such as in a library, a medical emergency could occur which may lead to the lose of a life if not attended to immediately, such fatality can be avoided if there is a cell phone in close proximity, with which to seek medical assistance immediately, this would not be possible if mobile phones were banned in such public areas.
Furthermore, I believe that mobile phones ought not to be banned as they all have a setting which when activated can prevent the intrusive nature of the phone in public areas, for example while in a library a person can put his or her phone on silent mode that way it will not be of any disturbance to others present in the library who may be trying to concentrate.
In conclusion, mobile phones can be a life saver in case of an emergency, and the intrusive nature of the cell phone can be avoided by putting it in a mode that will not disturb others, and as such should not be banned in public areas.
- Every one of us should become a vegetarian because eating meat can cause serious health problems to what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Every one of us should become a vegetarian because eating meat can cause serious health problems to what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that the use of mobile cell phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Some people think that the use of mobile cell phones should be banned in public places such as in libraries shop and on public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 51
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...emergency could occur which may lead to the lose of a life if not attended to immediatel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
... be avoided if there is a cell phone in close proximity, with which to seek medical assistance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41897233202 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49828011893 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.105745839 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.333333333 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.1666666667 20.7667163134 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360556848696 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216915382163 0.084324248473 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102653772121 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259637911496 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713565682733 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...emergency could occur which may lead to the lose of a life if not attended to immediatel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
... be avoided if there is a cell phone in close proximity, with which to seek medical assistance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1118.0 1615.20841683 69% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.41897233202 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49828011893 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 176.041082164 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450592885375 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 16.0721442886 37% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 42.0 20.2975951904 207% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.105745839 49.4020404114 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 186.333333333 106.682146367 175% => OK
Words per sentence: 42.1666666667 20.7667163134 203% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360556848696 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216915382163 0.084324248473 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102653772121 0.0667982634062 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259637911496 0.151304729494 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713565682733 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.5 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.31 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 11.3001002004 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.24 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 78.4519038076 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.8 10.1190380762 186% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.7795591182 176% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.