Self-driving cars
The lecture explains the problems with driverless cars. Specifically, the lecturer points out how all three benefits of self-driving cars stated in the article can be wrong.
First, the lecturer attacks the safety of autonomous vehicles. He brings up the point that driverless cars run the software, that is written by humans, and humans can make errors in it. Furthermore, a man provides an example of the famous driverless car, which has traveled more than a million kilometers without a single accident and has crashed into another car last month. This accident received a lot of media attention and it is indicative of the fact that autonomous cars aren’t safe yet.
Secondly, the article states that self-driving cars are better for the environment because they can start and stop their engines less frequently. However, the lecturer tells that even if this is the case, pollution can still increase. That is because driverless cars don’t require a driver’s license and people would start using them more often, thus the number of cars on the roads will increase. Therefore, even if autonomous vehicles will be more fuel-efficient, this technology can still have a negative effect on the environment.
Finally, the lecturer agrees that self-driving cars may increase the amount of our free time. But he argues that this is not necessarily a good thing. He states that for most people, driving is a welcome distraction, and people enjoy their time behind the wheel. If self-driving cars would free up this time, people would spend the trip time the same way they already spend most of their day.
All things considered, the lecturer successfully refutes all advantages of self-driving cars, provided by the article. He highlights the problems with autonomous vehicles that the mainstream media usually ignores.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-14 | KnockingOn | 83 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | EiLonMask | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-16 | opryzhek | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-31 | Hoda95 | 80 | view |
| 2022-07-24 | SAPTORSHI GUPTA | 85 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2074829932 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8002949178 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3712949144 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6875 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393540576314 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123677492474 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125758908659 0.0662205650399 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219473910949 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639828220184 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 294.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2074829932 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8002949178 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56462585034 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3712949144 49.2860985944 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.6875 110.228320801 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393540576314 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123677492474 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125758908659 0.0662205650399 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219473910949 0.162205337803 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639828220184 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 63.6247240618 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.