Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Life without nature seems to me like a painting without colours. It would be an uphill legal battle to fight for the scant amount of wilderness areas left but a battle that needs to be fought now for the sake of the environment. Precedents set with such laws by nations to protect such areas in their natural state would be a great win for the environment and its advocates for years to come.
However, I can concede that such an undertaking would be stall urbanization and human development to an extent but here are two reasons why I agree with the prompt.
First of all, if such laws are not passed or put in place, this would lead to a whole plethora of flora and fauna getting endangered and quite possible going extinct. An example of this would be the time when the population of tigers in the wild in India had gone down considerably due to their poaching, habitat loss and illegal hunting. Certain measures were put into place by the government to introduce and increase the population of tigers in the wild in the Indian subcontinent.
Secondly, wilderness areas are not completely all about the flora and fauna present there but also about the ecosystem that they represent, which can be evidently seen in the national reserves and parks and how our Forest Departments study and maintain such ecosystems for them to thrive and sustain without any human intervention in the long run. If such habitual encroaching and destruction of these areas are continued and there are no laws or legal backing for them, these whole ecosystems get uprooted and destroyed. An example would be, say, if we remove the natural predators of deers, like wolves, from the wilderness, the deer population would increase dramatically. This in turn would lead to further consumption of their main food, the grasslands. This in turn would lead to patches and or even areas of barren lands, which could turn swathes of areas to deserts in a few decades. The ramifications of such laws either being or not being in place play a huge role in how we will see our planet in the coming years.
However, I'll agree that increased urbanization due to an ever increasing population will always exist, but if this comes at the cost of certain species going extinct, then is too high a price to pay and legislation should be in place to make sure species that are endangered do not go the way of the Dodo or the Java Tiger.
In the end, laws & legislation should be passed and exist in place to protect species that already showing signs of despair from their dwindling numbers and that we should do what we can to protect their ecosystems from getting destroyed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | musahibf | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | frakznd | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | frakznd | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
...r planet in the coming years. However, Ill agree that increased urbanization due t...
^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Ill) must be used with a third-person verb: 'agrees'.
Suggestion: agrees
...anet in the coming years. However, Ill agree that increased urbanization due to an e...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2177.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 464.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69181034483 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64119157421 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59043483646 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.9052245935 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.133333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.9333333333 23.4991977007 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183989370932 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613352287549 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373739972556 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942157602571 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03639875915 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 48.8420337079 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.