Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
There are varieties of flora and fauna in Earth that are directly correlated with our lives. Considering the role of the forests and the wild animals in the ecological balance; it is obvious that the given prompt holds true to a great extent. However, sometimes it might not be the case. Therefore, I am mostly consonant with the author's statement.
In recent years, the issue of climate change has been a pressing concern. Climate change not only affects the animals and the natural environment but also us- humans-, consequently. Preservation of the wilderness and the inhabitants of it can significantly mitigate the issue of climate change- as the co2 emissions can be consumed by the plants and eventually reduce the concentration of it, which is one of the major gases inducing climate change. So, conserving the forest area would be the rational decision for the longevity of the human race.
Not only does the wilderness safeguard us from potential threats, but also it helps us in research and recreational activities. Nature is the habitat of the billions of live species at present, and in the past, it had also served the same for various creatures. In the present days, we can find a number of National Parks and Wildlife Reserves; they not only protect rare species but also act as the mind freshening medicines- people can visit the parks and reserves whenever they are bored and can be revitalized by the natural beauty of the animals and the environments. Therefore, the wilderness should be preserved by the necessary laws of the government.
It might be a wise decision to preserve the wild species in their natural habitat, however, in some cases, it might be impossible to save them at any cost and effort. For instance, a natural disaster like a flood can wipe out an entire group of certain species found in the typical habitat- like the one-horned rhino found in Chitwan national park of Nepal. In such cases spending a lot of money on them can be unreasonable as we know mammoths and dinosaurs became extinct millions of years ago, but they have no impact now as life flourishes in its own way.
In conclusion, we should try to conserve the wilderness in its natural state by implementing any sort of laws that are helpful; but if conserving is unreasonable as mentioned above, we need to let it go.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-04 | mako_mew@hotmail.com | 50 | view |
| 2023-02-23 | Yam Kumar Oli | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-27 | musahibf | 75 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | frakznd | 50 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | frakznd | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis Ten years ago as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard housi 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 83
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 50
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a first time director whose only previous exper 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...erefore, I am mostly consonant with the authors statement. In recent years, the issu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, in some cases, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1939.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 400.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8475 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78450960674 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4512497736 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.1875 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.21951772744 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16139013675 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516169535729 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466048010907 0.0758088955206 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851480516696 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0164860339511 0.0667264976115 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.