The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks.
Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The diagram below illustrates how carbonated drinks are manufactured.
In general, there are five stages, and water is produced entirely by machine, beginning with preparing water to drink and finally packaging after consumption.
To begin with, raw water goes through a filter to make a softener and remove all chemicals in the substance. The next stage is heating evaporation and carbonation. In this stage, the liquid is pumped into the electrical heater and run through a cooling pipe. After that, carbon dioxide is mixed with the liquid to create carbonated drinks.
In the third stage of the process, carbonated water is delivered to the mixing tank by a long pipe where it is put together with coloring, syrup, and flavor. In stage four, the carbonated drink gets filtered again. Finally, water is filled into cans and plastic bottles and put into boxes before being transported by truck to the supermarket to sell and consume.
- The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007 78
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the stone age One was made 1 4 million years ago and the other was made 800 thousand years ago viewing from the back view front view and side view Summarize the information by selecting and repor 100
- Some people think that zoos are cruel and should be closed down Others believe that zoos are useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both points of views and give your opinion 78
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 100
- With an increasing number of people eating fast food which if eating to regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is ban it completely To what extent do you agree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, third, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68906445324 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623376623377 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.8277153949 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1111111111 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100040025325 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458195315388 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407082007893 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685372007415 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361249352294 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.