The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
The method of educating one’s child varies by culture and even by household, and there is no fixed answer what the best way teaching is. In regard to this issue, the given prompt contends that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. I mostly disagree with this position for two reasons that are listed below. However, I do concede that praising good behaviors or actions may motivate children to sustain these demeanors.
First of all, parents and teachers cannot correct bad actions when they disregard them, which may keep children conduct negative actions that may cause repercussions in the future. For instance, if parents do not refrain their children from eating excessive amount of candies, which is one of the negative actions that many kids display, they are likely to sustain that behavior and eventually suffer teeth cavity and other health issues. Furthermore, if children are not corrected when they use violence to their peers, they may not realize that their actions may inflict harms on others, which possibly devastates the personal relationship. In consequence, they are likely to be isolated and have a limited social scope in the future. These examples show that children are likely to persist negative actions when parents or teachers merely ignore them. This educational method is highly prone to mislead children and is hardly likely to make them grow as healthy individuals.
Secondly, besides having negative outcomes in children’s future, ignoring negative actions when teaching them is also unlikely to improve children’s academic performance. For example, in school, if teachers do not correct the students’ mistake in arithmetic, they are highly prone to make the same mistake in the future, which makes their mathematical skills stagnate. Furthermore, when learning how to play basketball in a P.E. class, if the teacher does not set right the students’ wrong positions when throwing a ball, they cannot know whether they are following the right postures and are highly prone to repeating the same error again later, which contributes to attaining a lower score in the P.E. class. These examples present that neglecting making correction to negative actions may hinder students’ improvement in academic performance, which may lower their chance of success in the future. Hence, it is crucial to be aware of whether students are doing negative actions and correct them.
Admittedly, giving compliments for positive actions can motivate students to sustain these actions, which leads to desirable results for children. For instance, if parents praise their children for finishing homework with no procrastination, they are likely to feel a sense of accomplishment and confidence and likely to keep completing homework on time. If, on the other hand, parents just say nothing about that action, children are less motivated to sustain finishing their assignments on time, which renders them less likely to persist that action in the future. These examples suggest that praising positive actions may give confidence and motivation to children, which increases the possibility of creating positive habits. Shoring up good habits is important for children because they enhance the likelihood of prosperity and success in the long term.
In conclusion, praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones cannot be the best way of teaching for the two reasons discussed above. Rather, parents and teachers should make corrections when their children make some mistakes or display wrong behaviors. However, it cannot be denied that giving compliments for good deeds can lead to positive educational effects to children.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
2024-10-13 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
2024-08-31 | hainess25 | 70 | view |
- Claim When one is making a decision it is better to have a limited number of options Reason The more options a person has the more difficult it is to make a rational decision 63
- Imagination is a more valuable asset than experience 66
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
- Because people increasingly feel compelled to share their personal details online the right to privacy is eroding 66
- Scinetists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3120.0 2235.4752809 140% => OK
No of words: 579.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38860103627 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90534594407 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7026386633 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 268.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46286701209 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 957.6 704.065955056 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0075449343 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.652173913 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1739130435 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5652173913 5.21951772744 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 5.13820224719 234% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316073229149 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119629559201 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15398797112 0.0758088955206 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239699555846 0.150359130593 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142517558547 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.