With the rapid advancement of communication technology: smart phones, tablets and other mobile devices, some people believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages.
To what extent do you agree or disagree
In the digital age, while the development of communication technology is contributing to modernization in the world, some think that there are some drawbacks of improving digital communication. In my view, although there are a couple of benefits of smart devices, it also exists some drawbacks.
On the one hand, the development of intelligence devices makes sedentary lifestyles and laziness. For reason, individuals can easily communicate with others via screen without going out. For instance, people can get in touch around the globe via Facebook, Instagram, and other social platforms, even it allows them to send messages and call videos together. As a result, day-by-day without movement can cause for them numerous diseases such as obesity and heart disease.
On the other hand, this trend plays a vital role in cooperation between people in different countries. Nowadays, people tend to use email, phone, or video as part of working, it is a good way to save time and money to do their essential work every day. Moreover, smartphones in general and smart devices in specific are able to access social networking platforms. As a result, people can make new friends who come from different cultures to widen their horizontal.
In conclusion, positive changes in technology offer many advances to human society, but it also has a lot of drawbacks that affect the life of people. In my view, individuals should limit their time using these technology devices and meet face-to-face much more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-06 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 56 | view |
| 2022-08-23 | nguvl | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-12 | chirox.ame | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | tangerinelinlin | 84 | view |
| 2017-07-21 | thanhhsgs30 | 84 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- The bar chart shows the types of media that people of different age groups used to get daily news in one country in 2011 84
- The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010 60
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Average p 73
- In a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport Discuss both thes 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20661157025 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89393119896 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640495867769 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0741328799 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182455580113 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585336462228 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276198661462 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982655070603 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216302697848 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1260.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20661157025 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89393119896 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640495867769 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0741328799 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182455580113 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585336462228 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276198661462 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982655070603 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216302697848 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.