Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this day and age, it has been increasingly asserted that national finance should be spent on the construction of accommodations and roads in place of the maintenance of outdated sites due to their extravagance. The essay below will take this viewpoint into consideration and explain the author’s partial disapproval of it.
On the one hand, it is true that the shift of the usage of tax money to building new facilities for living and moving can deliver economic fruition. To rationalize this, the booming growth of big cities is giving rise to the demand for housing and transport. Therefore, since outdated structures might take up an extraneously large space, reasonable destruction of them might not only save the expenses for maintenance but also make way for the construction of modern facilities, meeting residents' needs and producing more profit. However, it should be noted that not all aged structures can be replaced, especially those linked with the past and culture. After all, it is clear that skyscrapers and highways are common between nations in the contemporary era, while heritages and legacies are symbolic of each.
On the other hand, I strongly opine that the abolition of historical buildings could severely damage the cultural preservation of humankind. To be specific, it takes only observation to notice that a sizeable number of old structures bring time-honored meanings or values that symbolize their location zones. If these are demolished, not only could humans forget about their pasts and origins but also would countries fail to keep their cultural pulchritude, thus leading to the loss of the uniqueness of tribes and peoples, All in all, it is ill-advised to abandon or replace historical constructions for the sake of urbanization because it is the national identity and image that could be in jeopardy.
In light of the aforementioned evidence, it is my conclusion that national money should be spent on the refurbishment of significant heritages as well as managing the establishment of new living and transport facilities. While it is true that some can be annihilated, government intervention is necessary to ascertain that the destruction does no harm to cultural preservation.
- Task 2 Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, after all, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2808988764 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12889071016 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581460674157 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.1119211275 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6666666667 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14104425463 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0500965977903 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.028543472566 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795928367226 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149426876998 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.94 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.