Despite increasing access to education, a significant number of people cannot read or write. What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take?
In recent years, with the development of society, the authorities around the world provide opportunities for people to study. Although there is an increase in number of people going to school, many of them can not read or write. In this essay, I will discuss deeply about the adverse effects and the solutions for the government.
First and foremost, education is always crucial for people to have better quality of life. As a matter of fact, with the improvement of technology, many companies just recruit employee who have high results in studying. As a result, people who can not read which also means that they will lose their opportunities to apply to big enterprises and have well-paid jobs. Furthermore, if they can not find jobs, they will not have money to serve for their life. Consequently, they will do illegal things such as steal cars, gold and so on in order to have money.
On the one hand, there are many feasible approaches that the government can apply to reduce this drawbacks. Firstly, in many poor families, although they really want to their children to pursue the higher education, they can not effort the tuition for them. Therefore, the government should reduce the schooling fees to encourage them to expand their knowledge. Another measure is that the government should launch awareness campaigns about the importance of education. Take Viet Nam, for example, thanks to the awareness campaigns, many VietNamese families let their children to go to schools to further their quality of life.
In conclusion, It is undeniable that people who do not have abilities to read or write can have many disadvantages. However, steps can be taken to mitigate the situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | tranlequihoang | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-19 | tranlequihoang | 61 | view |
| 2023-01-15 | tieuquynh | 80 | view |
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 73
- It is true that nowadays social media platforms such as Facebook and Twitter which are used by many users are replacing real communication in daily life 56
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Agree or disagree 78
- In the future there will be a higher proportion of older people than young people in many countries Is it a positive or negative effects 56
- Some people think that all college students should study whatever they like Others believe they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both of these views and give 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...that the government can apply to reduce this drawbacks. Firstly, in many poor famili...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00354609929 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72817668798 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6589598819 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114970834318 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453508085278 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537266462385 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784464116751 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293360634528 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...that the government can apply to reduce this drawbacks. Firstly, in many poor famili...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a matter of fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00354609929 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72817668798 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.6589598819 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.0666666667 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114970834318 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453508085278 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537266462385 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784464116751 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293360634528 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.