Studies have suggested that children watch much more television than they did in the past and spend less time on activities or creative things. What are the reasons and what measures should be taken to encourage children to spend more time on active or creative things?
Nowadays, the amount of time children spend on watching television is increasing noticeably in comparison with that in the past. Additionally, they also spend less time on active or creative things. This problem is caused by lots of factors and I believe it could be addressed by several viable solutions.
There are two main reasons for this common problem. Firstly, these days teenagerhave a heavy curriculum and too much homework to do. Therefore, they tend to sit or lie down and watch TV programmes after a hard-working day with a tired spirit rather than exercising - an activity that requires a lot of energy. Secondly, parents don’t motivate their children to exercise or do creative things. For instance, they are busy with a heavy workload so they don’t have time to pay more attention and play with their children, especially outdoor activities.
In order to solve these two problems, parents should encourage and play with their children regularly to limit their TV watching. In addition, it can help them improve their health and be more connected to their children. Moreover, teenagers can find something they are interested in like playing the piano, drawing or taking photos… to relax in freetime but not feel forced. These activities can also help them to improve many skills.
In conclusion, there are a variety of reasons why children spend much more time watching television and spend less time on active or creative things. However, these problems can be solved by some practical solutions
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | Đặng Gia Hân | 56 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1279.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15725806452 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71274959009 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600806451613 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.104964322 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3571428571 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7142857143 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364694711868 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125434017566 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136468946922 0.0667982634062 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.255719878203 0.151304729494 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118606713496 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.