The maps show changes in the village of Meadowside and the town of Fonton from 1962 to now.
The map given shows the transformation of Meadowside village and Fonton in three years.
From an overall perspective, it is evident that the two areas witnessed significant changes, extending the residential area while more buildings are constructed for recreational activities.
In the period from 1962 to 1985, the eastern part of Meadowside was enlarged while there was expansion in the western region of Fonton. They built housing estate, leisure complex and a super-store in the western region of Meadowside hamlet. Moreover, the road was enlarged and became more convenient.
From 1985 to the present, the residental ares were continually enlarged with more buildings and then were consolidated. The housing estate, super-store and leisure complex remained unchanged, while there was the emergence of hotel, station on the one side of the road and business park on the other side. To make it more favourable for residents to move, Meadowside suburbs were constructed in the northwest of the area.
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainme 84
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The maps show changes in the village of Meadowside and the town of Fonton from 1962 to now 89
- The maps show changes in the village of Meadowside and the town of Fonton from 1962 to now 78
- As well as making money businesses also have social responsibilities Do you agree or disagree 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42038216561 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96537690369 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579617834395 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.9016706111 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187282998316 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899044784528 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115801828889 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143916903206 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131008958839 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.