28.7.2018: Some people say that economic growth is the way to the end of poverty and hunger. Other say that economic growth is damaging the environment and must stop now. Discuss bith view and give your own opinion.
Economic development plays an essential role in many parts of the world. While some believe it is the only solution to starvation and poverty, I would agree with those who claim that this would have detrimental effects on the environment and should be perpetuated.
On the one hand, various positive effects of economic development on the poor and hungry. First and foremost, the highly developed economic era has created more job opportunities for people to earn for living. As a result, not only the high standard of living helps them afford the basic necessities, such as food, and housing, but also the rate of those living under poverty has gradually declined. In economic growth, overproducing and excessive productivity can help the hunger to live day-by-day and encourage the product goods of the country. Moreover, when people possess a high standard of living satisfying their needs. For instance, they want a range of personal technology or speed in travel. More possessions, more space, and more mobility.
On the other hand, applying the development of the economy will pose an adverse threat to the quality of human life, especially the environment. The first reason relates to overconsumption and overproduction when people have more requests for necessities. Therefore, it poses an enormous threat to non-renewable natural resources and climate change. In addition, the amount of energy and raw material used for the production of machinery will escalate. For example, intensive farming causes soil degradation and poor living conditions for livestock, and excessive use of fertilizer and pesticides is the main reason for spending, poverty, and destruction of the whole community.
In conclusion, although the advantages of abundance and wealth can positively contribute to society, from my point of view, environment-related drawbacks can be overcome.
- The bar chart shows the number of people working in four sports sectors in an Australian town in 2016 You should spend 20 minutes for this task Only less than 250 words 64
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- Many people have a close relationship with their pets These people treat their birds cats or other animals as members of their family In your opinion as such relationships good Why or Why not 84
- The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001 56
- 2 7 2022 Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...tandard of living helps them afford the basic necessities, such as food, and housing, but also th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43642611684 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11226775875 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2339416022 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10150934789 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320545106091 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031918530406 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561022420948 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310655090442 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...tandard of living helps them afford the basic necessities, such as food, and housing, but also th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43642611684 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11226775875 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615120274914 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2339416022 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.86666666667 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.10150934789 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0320545106091 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.031918530406 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0561022420948 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310655090442 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.