28.7.2018: Some people say that economic growth is the way to the end of poverty and hunger. Other say that economic growth is damaging the environment and must stop now. Discuss bith view and give your own opinion.
There is no doubt that economic development plays an essential role in many parts of the world. While some believe that it is the only solution to starvation and poverty, I would agree with those who claim that this
would have detrimental effects on the environment and should be perpetuated.
On the one hand, there are many positive effects of economical development on the poor and hungry. Firstly, the highly developed economic era creates more job opportunities for people to earn for living. As a result, not only the high standard of living helps them afford the basic necessities of life like commodities, food, accommodation and but also the rate of those living under poverty life has gradually declined. In an economic growth, overproducing and ecessing productivity can help the hunger to live day by day and encourage the product goods of the country. Moreover, when people possess a high standard of living it may easily satisfy their needs. For instance, they want a greater range of personal technology or greater speed in travel. More possessions, more space, and more mobility.
On the other hand, applying the rapid development of the economy, which will pose a serious threat to the quality of human life, especially to the environment. The first reason relates to overconsumption and overproduction when people have more requests for necessities. Therefore, it poses a big threat to non-renewable natural resources and climate change. In addition, the amount of energy and raw material used for the production of machinery will escalate. For example, intensive farming causes soil degradation and poor living conditions for livestock, and excessive use of fertilizer and pesticides is the main reason for spent and infertile land, poverty, and destruction of the whole community.
In conclusion, although the advantages of abundance and wealth can positively contribute to society, from my point of view, environment-related drawbacks can be overcome.
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost 61
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sports in an English town in 2012 67
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 79
- Some young people like to copy the behavior clothes of famous people Why might this be the case What problems might it cause 92
- 2 7 2022 Nowadays people depend on technology in their free time Is this a positive or negative development 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...and, there are many positive effects of economical development on the poor and hungry. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...tandard of living helps them afford the basic necessities of life like commodities, food, accommo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31948881789 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08503471455 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4712383748 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100102867675 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312368363834 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313033633549 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486213758806 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272205691425 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...and, there are many positive effects of economical development on the poor and hungry. Fir...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...tandard of living helps them afford the basic necessities of life like commodities, food, accommo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1665.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31948881789 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08503471455 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619808306709 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4712383748 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.0 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100102867675 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312368363834 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313033633549 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486213758806 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272205691425 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.